> jerenkrantz    01/08/16 17:26:38
> 
>   Modified:    .        STATUS
>   Log:
>   Hello, Goodbye.
>    
>        * use apu_dbm in mod_auth_dbm
>            Status: Greg +1 (low-priority volunteer)
>   +        Justin says: "Seems like this is already there, so should we just 
>   +                      remove the other DBM code in that file?  If you want 
>   +                      to use gdbm, or dbm, etc, you should tell apr-util."

I'm not sure about this.

If a user has many (existing) gdbm user databases, but would rather use Berkley db 
for caching performance in the bits like mod_ssl and mod_usertrack, why should we 
cripple their auth_dbm?

Bill

Reply via email to