> As these files never left http://dev.apache.org/dist for > http://www.apache.org/dist > I don't see an issue with using the 2.0.21 identifier. > > Disagreement? I think it is okay for this release. ....Roy
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATU... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 S... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Roy T. Fielding
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Roy T. Fielding
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Gonyou, Austin
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ian Holsman
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Aaron Bannert
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ian Holsman
