From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 5:16 PM
> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 3:56 PM
>
>
> > Hey, what's going on with the retagging? There exists on developer dist:
> >
> > -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 5383847 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z
> > -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 466 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.Z.asc
> > -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 3226188 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz
> > -rw-r--r-- rbb httpd 466 Jul 19 16:59 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.tar.gz.asc
> > -rw-r--r-- wrowe httpd 4305440 Jul 20 13:20 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip
> > -rw-r--r-- wrowe httpd 477 Jul 20 13:16 httpd-2_0_21-alpha.zip.asc
> >
> > which means that there are now two different versions of the source being
> > called 2.0.21? That is bad.
>
> They are now consistent.
>
> As these files never left http://dev.apache.org/dist for http://www.apache.org/dist
> I don't see an issue with using the 2.0.21 identifier.
Althought I would have no issue with renaming as httpd-2_0_21-alpha-r2.*
> Disagreement?
