Xan schrieb: > Hi, > > Is there any way of marking the "importance" of a path? Clearly in the > forest there are primary paths and secondary paths (which begin from the > primary paths). Something like type=primary, type=secondary, ...?
In Europe those are mostly tracks (wide enough for a 2-tracked vehicle to pass through) and the "importance" can be read off of the grade/tracktype. for paths (only wide enough for walking or a horse/bicycle/motorcycle etc) you can also use the physical features. IMO this gives a much better picture about the tracks and paths in a forest. And the "importance" is almost directly mappable to the physical features, i.e. an important path or track is much better maintained, and usualla also better equipped (maybe even paved), or at least wider as a less important counterpart. -- Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie Bremen - 53.0901°N 8.7868°E
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
