En/na Dirk-Lüder Kreie ha escrit: > Xan schrieb: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there any way of marking the "importance" of a path? Clearly in the >> forest there are primary paths and secondary paths (which begin from the >> primary paths). Something like type=primary, type=secondary, ...? >> > > In Europe those are mostly tracks (wide enough for a 2-tracked vehicle > to pass through) and the "importance" can be read off of the > grade/tracktype. > for paths (only wide enough for walking or a horse/bicycle/motorcycle > etc) you can also use the physical features. > IMO this gives a much better picture about the tracks and paths in a > forest. And the "importance" is almost directly mappable to the physical > features, i.e. an important path or track is much better maintained, and > usualla also better equipped (maybe even paved), or at least wider as a > less important counterpart. > > > In the wiki page of path [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath], there is a comment abput that it's enough wide for 4-tracked vehicle to pass throught and not legally impeded, then it's track. You mention 2-tracked. What is the real?
We have http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype in track but what is the equivalent in path? What are the features a path could have that I can add to a path? Thanks a lot, Xan. _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
