En/na Jonathan Bennett ha escrit: > On 25/03/2010 20:20, Xan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is there any way of marking the "importance" of a path? Clearly in the >> forest there are primary paths and secondary paths (which begin from the >> primary paths). Something like type=primary, type=secondary, ...? >> > > The standard reply to this question is "important to who, and why?". > > While I know what you're trying to map, you should do it in terms that > are easily verifiable, such as the width of the track and the surface. > Imposing an arbitrary hierarchy on the tracks doesn't really add any > usable information, since I don't know the criteria you've used to > determine what's "primary" and what's "secondary". > > See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability for another > description of the problem with using tags like importance. > Yes, primary and secondary is "arbitrary". The width is much appropiate. How can I add the width and the surface of the path? Can I add that the path is not clean (there are trees or bushes in difficulting the pass through).
Thanks, Xan. _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
