Craig, Thank you. I will go ahead and delete these if I encounter during other editing after having checked their history and verified that they are of course not part of a way or relation.
Mike On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Craig Wallace <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2013-03-28 23:39, Mike Thompson wrote: > >> Can nodes with no tags (e.g. node54182420 >> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/node/54182420<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/54182420> >> > >> ) be deleted? >> > > Yes, if a node has no tags, and isn't part of any ways or relations then > it is a bug. So it should be deleted. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/** > wiki/Untagged_unconnected_node<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Untagged_unconnected_node> > > Though it is worth checking the history to see where it has come from, and > whether it is supposed to have any tags. > > For that node, it looks like it was originally from the TIGER import, and > didn't have any useful tags. It may have been part of a way, if the rest of > the way was deleted but the nodes left behind for some reason. > There doesn't seem to be anything relevant visible on the aerial imagery > anyway. So no problem to delete that node. > > Craig > > ______________________________**_________________ > newbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/newbies<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies> >
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
