Andy, Thanks for your reply. I just visited that place in person (which was why I was doing edits in the area). I can't think of anything observable on the ground that could be mapped where those nodes are that would also have been part of a Tiger Import. If the community would prefer, I can just leave them. Since I was doing edits in the area I thought I would clean them up. BTW, I have seen this in other areas, and I have seen it before the redaction bot was run. Although each case may be different, it seems that in general this is a common occurrence.
Mike On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 3:19 PM, SomeoneElse <[email protected]>wrote: > Mike Thompson wrote: > > Can nodes with no tags (e.g. node 54182420 > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/54182420> > ) be deleted? > > > That particular example is one left behind by the licence change redaction > process (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License in > the wiki for some information about that). What probably happened was: > > 1) Someone how didn't agree to have their data licensed under the new > licence added a feature > > 2) Someone who did added extra detail to that feature (including the node > that you see left behind) > > 3) The redaction process removed the contribution by (1) but left the > contribution by (2). > > Where that node is, therefore, is something that someone thought worthy of > mapping that isn't represented on the map. Rather than just deleting it, > I'd go there and see what that thing might be, and map it again. > > Cheers, > > Andy > > > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies > >
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
