It is common - I quite often come across them. And I have several times caught myself making them by idly double-clicking when thinking of something else. I hope I have caught and removed all those I have made - if not, please remove them for me!

I am quite happy to blame software for some of them - no software is perfect. But this applies to the 'liveware' too.

Roger

PS there was also until recently a bug in Potlatch II which created nodes when the background image was changed - see http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/potlatch-dev/2012-September/001843.html.


On 03/04/2013 00:45, Mike Thompson wrote:
Andy,

Thanks for your reply. I just visited that place in person (which was why I was doing edits in the area). I can't think of anything observable on the ground that could be mapped where those nodes are that would also have been part of a Tiger Import. If the community would prefer, I can just leave them. Since I was doing edits in the area I thought I would clean them up. BTW, I have seen this in other areas, and I have seen it before the redaction bot was run. Although each case may be different, it seems that in general this is a common occurrence.

Mike



On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 3:19 PM, SomeoneElse <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Mike Thompson wrote:
    Can nodes with no tags (e.g. node54182420
    <http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/54182420>

        ) be deleted?


    That particular example is one left behind by the licence change
    redaction process (see
    http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License in the
    wiki for some information about that).  What probably happened was:

    1) Someone how didn't agree to have their data licensed under the
    new licence added a feature

    2) Someone who did added extra detail to that feature (including
    the node that you see left behind)

    3) The redaction process removed the contribution by (1) but left
    the contribution by (2).

    Where that node is, therefore, is something that someone thought
    worthy of mapping that isn't represented on the map.  Rather than
    just deleting it, I'd go there and see what that thing might be,
    and map it again.

    Cheers,

    Andy


    _______________________________________________
    newbies mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies




_______________________________________________
newbies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Roger Calvert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
newbies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies

Reply via email to