Hi Patrick. How are you ? I'm happy you are studying some NH's internals and we have appreciate so much your patch (http://216.121.112.228/browse/NH-2263) even if we have some difficult to apply it, as is, basically because we are using SVN.
To move the WebContext in a separated assembly is not a big deal even if I'm not so sure about how much it will be appreciate by NH users. The remotion of log4net was matter of a long discussion here in dev-list and will be a long work to do in NH. If you have some proposals we will evaluate it and, with Frans's help, we will discuss it again. In NH there are a lot of classes/interfaces that, apparently, looks like dead-code because you can't find a direct usage or even an implementation. Most of that code represents a set of advanced pluggable features of NH. Please use our issue tracker to propose the remotion of classes, but, please, after study which is its scope. We will take your proposals in account following votes of your issues. For everything you need don't hesitate to contact our support department and, by the way, I'm sure that Frans will help us to follow you giving you some deep technical details about anything you need to know about NH internals. Thanks for your effort to make NH better. Sincerely. Fabio Maulo. P.S. perhaps now I can go back to C# On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: > > Bah!?!???? > > I think Sergej is referring to the remark you made: " Before define > something as dead-code and try to remove it from NH core, you should be sure > you are a NH's user and you are using it in a commercial big application > already in production." > > Which could be interpreted as (as I did): "son, before you come here > and point at classes to be 'dead code' be sure you 1) are even an nhibernate > user and 2) use it in a big ass production system. If not, go away" > > FB > > > > > > > 2010/8/1 Sergej Koščejev <[email protected]> > > > > > > On 1.8.2010 16:54, Fabio Maulo wrote: > > > > > > rude ? > > What you are talking about ? > > > > > > > > Your reply to Patrick appeared to me to contain a personal attack, > > and I believe it's better if we keep the discussion on technical matters > > technical. > > > > Sergej > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Fabio Maulo > > > > > -- Fabio Maulo
