again another erudite. I didn't say nothing about Henry proposal and you are saying something to me. Who you are ?
IMO there is no problem just because it is one minute fix, using Resharper, renaming the interface. On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > Exactly the constructive answer you'd expect these days from NH's lead. > > So, what about it? The request is trivial, and Henry will supply a patch. > > -- Roelof > > Op 18 sep. 2010 om 17:15 heeft Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > > Perhaps I should send the same request to Microsoft .NET team because they > have used ISet. > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Johannes Gustafsson <<[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I have the same problem where it conflicts with our own ILogger interface. >> I guess NHibernate.ILogger should not be used outside NH anyway (except for >> contrib and NHibernate.* libs) so hiding it in a deeper namespace is a good >> idea IMHO. >> >> /Johannes >> >> 2010/9/18 Henry Conceição < <[email protected]> >> [email protected]> >> >> Hi, >>> >>> While I was updating one of my projects to NHibernate 3 alpha 2, I did >>> notice that the ILogger interface is placed directly under the >>> NHibernate root namespace. Although I think that the abstraction is a >>> good thing, it's too exposed and conflicts with any other ILogger >>> (Castle's one for example) out there. >>> >>> That been said, I want to know if it's possible to move it to a more >>> internal namespace, like NHibernate.Logging or something like that. If >>> the asnwer is yes, I'll be happy to provide a patch for that. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Henry Conceição >>> >> >> > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > -- Fabio Maulo
