Umm... So a person made up this design that goes completely opposite of what the literature says and you call him a 'DDD purist'? Personally I am a strong proponent of micro as well as macro evolution ... does that make me a intelligent design purist?
It's people like you that are clouding opinion of DDD. From what you have discussed you are not using DDD. Greg On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Tommaso Caldarola <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2 Feb, 17:01, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can you please show me a 'ddd purist' who believes in directly >> exposing their entities? > > I'm running a project in which they are defined more than 600 > entities, 95% of which are directly exposed. I think that sometimes > the real scenario is quite different from the literature, fortunately > I say. > > > -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
