Maybe I was not quite clear, I meant to say that there are scenarios in which one can not be purist because it involves an extra effort in terms of maintenance and project management.
On 4 Feb, 16:54, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote: > Umm... > > So a person made up this design that goes completely opposite of what > the literature says and you call him a 'DDD purist'? Personally I am a > strong proponent of micro as well as macro evolution ... does that > make me a intelligent design purist? > > It's people like you that are clouding opinion of DDD. From what you > have discussed you are not using DDD. > > Greg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
