He didn't say he was using DDD. Stop beating him up and start trying to help him (and the rest of us DDD-ignorami) understand the problem and your proposed solution.
On Feb 4, 3:54 pm, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote: > Umm... > > So a person made up this design that goes completely opposite of what > the literature says and you call him a 'DDD purist'? Personally I am a > strong proponent of micro as well as macro evolution ... does that > make me a intelligent design purist? > > It's people like you that are clouding opinion of DDD. From what you > have discussed you are not using DDD. > > Greg > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Tommaso Caldarola <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2 Feb, 17:01, Greg Young <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can you please show me a 'ddd purist' who believes in directly > >> exposing their entities? > > > I'm running a project in which they are defined more than 600 > > entities, 95% of which are directly exposed. I think that sometimes > > the real scenario is quite different from the literature, fortunately > > I say. > > -- > It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought > without accepting it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
