I insist on wearing a helmet and I insist on wearing seatbelts, however I
resent the fact that a suit in Austin says I have to.
In answer to the gf reluctant to buckle up, I had that problem, apparently
it was more important to dig through a purse or check the vanity mirror
rather than buckle up first then do those things. I finally decided that
anyone not wearing a belt while /I'm/ driving must be looking for adventure
and excitement. So I use my right foot to give them all I can. Now they
really really WANT that seatbelt but the g-forces are keeping it locked.
Only takes a couple of those before the seatbelt becomes the priority.

-Kyle
On Jul 4, 2011 1:50 AM, "Kurt Nolte" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Touchy subject still, but I believe in free choice too. But to be a free
and
> clear choice, people have to also be able to refuse to, say, insure you,
or
> treat you if you did something monumentally stupid like not wearing a
helmet
> or a seatbelt and you cause yourself injury that could have easily been
> prevented.
>
> I hate that this guy died. I wish he hadn't. In fact, I'm not even going
to
> say that I wish he had simply cracked his head hard or rattled his brain
to
> make the point. I wish that kind of harm only on my enemies, and I don't
> even know him. If he /had/ to wreck, by some divine force, I do just wish
> he'd had the head thump and brain rattle rather than the death, though. At
> least then he could recover and continue living, possibly with a changed
> outlook on helmets.
>
> I'm just saying that it's pretty bone-headed (or not) to not take even the
> simplest of precautions to protect one of the few organs you have that
> doesn't grow back.
>
> And yes, I take much the same view on things like seatbelts (my new
> girlfriend and I are already butting heads over this, she just doesn't
have
> the habit of putting it on, I make her put it on in my car) or riding
around
> in the bed of a pickup truck (which is in and of itself illegal just
because
> of the belt laws, it doesn't have to be explicitly banned people. My
> state... *Facepalm*).
>
> -Kurt
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 2:32 AM, James O'Gorman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I know this is a touchy subject, but I believe in free choice. It is
>> unfortunate that the government had to get involved and tell people what
to
>> do, but it is also sad that this guy lost his life.
>>
>> This is the same as the seatbelt argument - it's really up to the
>> individual, but you're taking a big risk if you don't. I think about my
wife
>> every time I go on the road and what she would have to do if I lost my
life
>> because of such a simple thing.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.

Reply via email to