Didnt mean any offense with the scooter thing, just my own line of thinking on the subject. For a bit I thought about making changes to get better mileage, but I ultimately concluded that for me.. it misses the point of motorcycles. It's all about having fun, and I like the fact that its as quick as it is!
On Jul 21, 7:29 pm, Mike21222 <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks everyone for your comments, even the guy with the scooter > comment, ha ha ha. > I think I'm gonna hold off for now. It just seemed like a neat idea, > but the more I think about it, the more I think I might be losing a > good thing (the current very well engineered design by Honda), for a > questionable one, (a small (possibly negligible) increase in fuel > consumption). Thanks again. > > On Jul 21, 12:22 am, Mike21222 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello I have a question. I was just wondering if anyone has any idea > > if going with a larger tire size in rear would give me better gas > > mileage. I have a unique commute where 17 of my 18 miles is Interstate > > 81 (67-77 mph), and I have a total of 2 stop signs each way. If I > > could drop my RPM's by say 3-5 hundred, I'm guessing I might squeeze > > another 3-5 mpg out of it. Forgive my fuzzy math. Any suggestions? I > > just got mine, so I can't even say what my mileage is yet, I'm still > > getting used to it. I'm thinking I should be getting the typical > > 40-50... Oh, BTW, in case you aren't aware this model is shaft drive, > > so conventional gearing ratio changes are out. Thanks > > > Mike21222 > > Fincastle, VA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en.
