That's an interesting approach. Can you comment on the Pros and Cons of using the K100D. My eyesight has deteriorated with middle age to the point where I am now looking to get autofocus lenses.
Thanks in advance. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Zuch Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 5:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Nikon] FX vs DX It is good to follow this particular thread and see that "the fires are still burning". I stopped using my film Nikon F80s five years ago, but the lenses are all still here, sitting in the drawer waiting for the day I can afford the F700 or its successor. However, in the meantime, I ended up using Pentax DSLRs, first the DS2 and now the K100D, with the cheap old Pentax prime lenses which all work with the DSLR body. I went for the DS2 because at that time its viewfinder beat the Nikon equivalent, the D70 viewfinder, hands down, and the body was small and very portable. Pentax K-mount primes are cheap and plentiful. I did not sell my Nikon primes and one day they will have a body to go with, but as an incedental result of the above choice I simply managed to avoid, or simply bypass, the Nikon DX format altogether. Robert Zuch Christchurch New Zealand -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://nikonusers.com/pipermail/nikon_nikonusers.com/attachments/20090811/f 596d9da/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Nikon mailing list [email protected] http://nikonusers.com/mailman/listinfo/nikon_nikonusers.com No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.406 / Virus Database: 270.13.49/2294 - Release Date: 08/10/09 18:19:00 _______________________________________________ Nikon mailing list [email protected] http://nikonusers.com/mailman/listinfo/nikon_nikonusers.com
