Vladimír Čunát <[email protected]> writes: > On 06/22/2014 03:45 PM, Florian Friesdorf wrote: >> Now I try to read this file: > > Ah, sorry, I didn't notice that you used the result as a nix string. > > Switching back and forth between nix (strings) and derivations (files) > is better avoided. The readFile function is only meant for what you have > among the nix source expressions. One probably can do more with > "recursive nix". > > Personally, I would try to do all work from that substituteAll point in > derivations and not through nix strings (i.e. catenate by cat command).
I've got a working solution: https://github.com/chaoflow/nixpkgs/blob/2efc8fe32239cccab0e1b89b3c0983a2857dd128/nixos/tests/python.nix#L23 Should I move replaceSubstring and interpolateAtAtVars to lib/strings.nix? Suggestions for better naming? -- Florian Friesdorf <[email protected]> GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083 Jabber/XMPP: [email protected] IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
pgpgCPZ4wOU6C.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
