On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:52 PM, andrew mcelroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Andrew Farnsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Wow, quick update here.  Intel i7 Processor has 731 Million transistors...
>> doubled already so knock 18 months off the deadline... call it 2190 now!!!
>
>
> Bah, binary processing is for the old fashioned!
>
> http://www2.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/40.918000
> Title: "Toward Quantum Computation: A Five-Qubit Quantum Processor"
>
> Now we are talking about some computing power.
>
> Andrew
>

EDIT: i didn't realize it requires a login... sorry. There are places on
google that can help you.

Andrew

>
> Andy
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Jack Coats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Only if you install the Flux Capacitor in your Tardis ;)
>>>
>>> ... Even Einstein didn't call E=MC**@ a law, just a good approximation
>>> of what he could determine.
>>> And to that extent the string theorists have proven that Einstein was
>>> wright, in that his statement was wrong,
>>> at least around the 'edges', but it, likes Newton's 'laws', are good
>>> within their defined domain.  Things tend
>>> to brake down at the 'edges' and when boundry conditions that need new
>>> understandings happen.
>>>
>>> I am guessing we will find the same with Moore's Law.  Do we really need
>>> transistors?  Yep, flux capacitors
>>> could be the next 'big thing' so we can re-start discussing Moore's law,
>>> Global Warming, Global Cooling and all the
>>> 'important topics' of the day!
>>>
>>> Time to go back to my hobbit hole and drink some KoolAide
>>>
>>> andrew mcelroy wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Andrew Farnsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     Nope, it means that to continue Moore's law we will need to start
>>> >     making our computer chips out of denser and denser matter.  It
>>> >     won't be long[*] before we need to start using Neurton stars as
>>> >     source material and not long after that before we will need to use
>>> >     the collapsed matter at the core of black holes.
>>> >
>>> >     Not long galactically speaking... we are currently at appoximately
>>> >     2^28 transistors.  If we assume Moore's Law will continue
>>> >     indefinetely, we find that by 2150 we have reached 1.5E51
>>> >     transistors.  Now working backwards and assuming we will be
>>> >     running 1 Thz chips, we find that by the year 2100 we will need to
>>> >     be using material denser than water (Water has a density of
>>> >     approximately 1Kg / Liter) to surpas this limit.  Wait!  We
>>> >     already are using materials that are denser than water!  Ok,
>>> >     Copper is about 9 times denser than water, lead is about 11 times
>>> >     denser than water.  Ok, we will work with 10 as an easy number...
>>> >     hmm, this only gives us an extra 4 years.  Ok, on to other
>>> >     materials.  Iridium is 22x as dense.  Another 18 months or so...
>>> >     Ahh, here we go, the core of the sun!  150x as dense as water...
>>> >     shoot, that is just another 4 years on top of iridium.  Ok, lets
>>> >     go really dense... 100,000,000,000,000x as dense (10^14) which
>>> >     gives us to 2148. Better but not good enough.  Black holes are
>>> >     next! 10^27 x as dense takes us to 2192.. Only another 50 years!
>>> >     So if we manage to continue Moore's law for the next 200 years we
>>> >     will all have a small black hole in our computer as the CPU..
>>> >     Somehow I think that Moore's law will break down before then.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ..but but what about a flux capacitor, surely we can some how right
>>> > those things with duct tape and the moon's gravity to build full
>>> adders?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     Did I mention that I love math :-)
>>> >
>>> > nope :-)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     Andy
>>> >
>>> >     Andrew
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Jack Coats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >         That means: turn off all computers and cell phones and global
>>> >         warming
>>> >         goes away? ;)
>>> >
>>> >         Andrew Farnsworth wrote:
>>> >         > I found the following quote on the wikipedia page for the
>>> >         ZFS file
>>> >         > system (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS)
>>> >         >
>>> >         > Quoting Jeff Bonwick (
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Bonwick)
>>> >         >
>>> >         > Although we'd all like Moore's Law
>>> >         > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_Law> to continue
>>> >         forever,
>>> >         > quantum mechanics
>>> >         <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics>
>>> >         > imposes some fundamental limits on the computation rate and
>>> >         > information capacity of any physical device. In particular,
>>> >         it has
>>> >         > been shown that 1 kilogram
>>> >         <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilogram> of
>>> >         > matter confined to 1 litre
>>> >         <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litre> of
>>> >         > space can perform at most 10^51 operations per second on at
>>> >         most 10^31
>>> >         > bits of information.^[10]
>>> >         > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS#cite_note-9> A fully
>>> populated
>>> >         > 128-bit storage pool would contain 2^128 blocks = 2^137
>>> >         bytes = 2^140
>>> >         >  bits; therefore the minimum mass required to hold the bits
>>> >         would be
>>> >         > (2^140  bits) / (10^31  bits/kg) = 136 billion kg. To
>>> >         operate at the
>>> >         > 10^31 bits/kg limit, however, the entire mass of the
>>> >         computer must be
>>> >         > in the form of pure energy. By E=mc², the rest energy of 136
>>> >         billion
>>> >         > kg is 1.2x10^28  J <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule>. The
>>> >         mass of
>>> >         > the oceans is about 1.4x10^21  kg. It takes about 4,000 J to
>>> >         raise the
>>> >         > temperature of 1 kg of water by 1 degree Celsius
>>> >         > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_Celsius>, and thus
>>> about
>>> >         > 400,000 J to heat 1 kg of water from freezing to boiling.
>>> >         The latent
>>> >         > heat of vaporization adds another 2 million J/kg. Thus the
>>> >         energy
>>> >         > required to boil the oceans is about 2.4x10^6  J/kg *
>>> >         1.4x10^21  kg =
>>> >         > 3.4x10^27  J. Thus, fully populating a 128-bit storage pool
>>> >         would,
>>> >         > literally, require more energy than boiling the oceans.^[11]
>>> >         > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS#cite_note-10>
>>> >         >
>>> >         >
>>> >         > Nothing like imposing some hard limits on a system :-)
>>> >         >
>>> >         > Andy^
>>> >         >
>>> >         > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"NLUG" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to