John Reinhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a plan to implement IMAP connectivity in nmh? If so, who's working
> on it and when might it be out?
I haven't heard of anyone working on that, but unfortunately nmh developers
often have a tendency not to announce what they're working on, so it's
possible that someone is.
The last time I remember IMAP support coming up was quite awhile ago, and
the commentary (from Richard Coleman??) was that IMAP support probably
wouldn't be forthcoming because IMAP would probably spell the eventual death
of [n]mh. I don't recall a lot of posts disagreeing with that view, though
I suspect if the subject were brought up again people would disagree.
The only other thing I remember from that discussion was that there were
IMAP implementations out there that used [n]mh as a back-end.
> If not, is there any objection to a Mail::NMH Perl package that provided
> such a capability via extension?
I don't quite understand the relation between nmh and your proposed Perl
package, but I'm sure there'd be no objections to any useful extensions to
nmh.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless | To prevent SPAM contamination, please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW. Thank you.
