Jerry Peek writes: : On 8 September 2000 at 20:05, Iain MacDonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > I'm just saying that an : > IMAP imeplementation could ignore sequences except for "unseen". : : I haven't thought a lot about internals here... but couldn't an IMAP : implementation just store its sequences in the context file (by : default, ~/Mail/context)? This is what commands like "mark -nopublic" : do. All nmh commands can access these sequences. Does IMAP actually have any concept of sequences, though? I thought that was left up to the client... time to get out that RFC :) ~Iain
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Jerry Peek
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ken Hornstein
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Shantonu Sen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ralph Corderoy
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Shantonu Sen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Scott Blachowicz
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Jerry Peek
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] John Reinhagen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] John Reinhagen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Jerry Peek
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Shantonu Sen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] clemensF
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] clemensF
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] clemensF