Jerry Peek writes:
: On 8 September 2000 at 20:05, Iain MacDonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > I'm just saying that an
: > IMAP imeplementation could ignore sequences except for "unseen".
:
: I haven't thought a lot about internals here... but couldn't an IMAP
: implementation just store its sequences in the context file (by
: default, ~/Mail/context)? This is what commands like "mark -nopublic"
: do. All nmh commands can access these sequences.
Does IMAP actually have any concept of sequences, though? I thought that was
left up to the client... time to get out that RFC :)
~Iain
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Jerry Peek
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ken Hornstein
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Shantonu Sen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ralph Corderoy
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Shantonu Sen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Scott Blachowicz
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Jerry Peek
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] John Reinhagen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] John Reinhagen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Jerry Peek
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Shantonu Sen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] clemensF
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] clemensF
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] clemensF
