Hi, > 9) Subfolders!: IMAP supports subfolders. Should we? What would the > notation and data representation be? Any backward-compatibility > problems? Speaking of which, how would local caches be stored? In a > folder called "IMAP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Yuck. Auxiliary files to keep > track of mappings? How do IMAP's subfolders differs from nmh's, e.g. `refile +inbox/tasks'. Or are you just saying nmh's IMAP support would include IMAP's subfolders? Ralph.
- [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] John Reinhagen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Anders Eriksson
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Jerry Peek
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ken Hornstein
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Shantonu Sen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Ralph Corderoy
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Shantonu Sen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Scott Blachowicz
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Jerry Peek
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Iain MacDonnell
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] Dan Harkless
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] John Reinhagen
- Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences] John Reinhagen