>If I remember correctly, wasn't there still some problems remaining with >the the code in CVS? I thought I remember some problems with date >processing.
IMHO, the only problem was with Dan's perception of the date processing. I thought the changes were fine. >If so, I would suggest rolling back those changes, if necessary. Then we >should release a snapshot to a wider audience (since it has been a long >time since the last release). That would at least get things rolling. Well, "go ahead". --Ken
