>Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ken Hornstein wrote: >> > >If I remember correctly, wasn't there still some problems remaining with >> > >the the code in CVS? I thought I remember some problems with date >> > >processing. >> > >> > IMHO, the only problem was with Dan's perception of the date processing. >> > I thought the changes were fine. > >Er, no, it wasn't just "my perception". The new date parsing code >incorrectly interprets many unofficial but widely-used textual timezones, >like "JST" (Japanese Standard Time).
If you think that it's _that_ important to have correct date handling for non-standard timezones that don't even seem to be used anymore ... well, I guess I don't even know what to say in regards to that, other than to point out that opimizing nmh behavor for _old_ mail seems to be self-defeating. --Ken
