> Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Neil W Rickert wrote: > > > nmh is rotten at the core. There is a lot of cruft, and probably > > > buffer overflows galore in the many library routines. > > > > Please excuse my blasphemous inquiry. Has anyone looked at the GNU > > project "mailutils"? > > Yes, we (the MH-E project) have added GNU mailutils support so its MH > support appears to be complete. I haven't personally used it though. > > I don't know if GNU mailutils would be a good next-generation nmh or > not. Perhaps someone might be able to expand upon this.
I seem to recall (an I may be wrong here), that mailutils did a one-folder-per-file thing, instead on nmh's one-message-per-file. I don't want to lose one-message-per-file, it's one of nmh's great strengths. Jon _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
