> From: Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:20:02 -0700 > > Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Neil W Rickert wrote: > > > nmh is rotten at the core. There is a lot of cruft, and probably > > > buffer overflows galore in the many library routines. > > > > Please excuse my blasphemous inquiry. Has anyone looked at the GNU > > project "mailutils"? > > Yes, we (the MH-E project) have added GNU mailutils support so its MH > support appears to be complete. I haven't personally used it though. > > I don't know if GNU mailutils would be a good next-generation nmh or > not. Perhaps someone might be able to expand upon this.
When I looked a while back, it appeared that just enough had been implemented
to support MH-E, but not enough to support exmh.
Clearly someone with the required C skills needs to get inspired to flesh out
other parts of the package so the other MH front ends can work.
Sadly, that person isn't me.
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues Trinsic Solutions
President 1611-B West 6th Street
Austin, TX 78703-5074
512-322-0180 http://www.trinsics.com
Would you rather proactively pay for
uptime or reactively pay for downtime?
Trinsic Solutions
Your Proactive IT Management Partner
pgp09Cr8Jw4kB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
