Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neil W Rickert wrote: > > nmh is rotten at the core. There is a lot of cruft, and probably > > buffer overflows galore in the many library routines. > > Please excuse my blasphemous inquiry. Has anyone looked at the GNU > project "mailutils"?
Yes, we (the MH-E project) have added GNU mailutils support so its MH support appears to be complete. I haven't personally used it though. I don't know if GNU mailutils would be a good next-generation nmh or not. Perhaps someone might be able to expand upon this. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
