Hi David, > > The aim would be for the existing users to have a code base that > > allowed more rapid, stable development of new features, deprecating > > old warts, and improving consistency. > > +1 > > I'd rather see more of all the above, even if it means giving up some > current capabilities. I don't think that should be done with the > current code base.
Could you clarify when you've time. the current code base should not give up current capabilities? Or that the existing one can't become one that allowed `more rapid, ...'? Either way, it suggests you think a new code base is required? -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers