Ken Hornstein <k...@pobox.com> wrote: >> We've talked a lot about the subtle change to move MH to Maildir, and we >> never quite work out all the wrinkles, and I'd sure like to that.
> I hear people say this, and I have to wonder ... what's the goal here? > If the goal is to share your mailbox with another client (or maybe > IMAP server) that understands Maildir, okay, fine, I can get that. But as > far as I can tell that's the only reason to do it. I have 2.3G of "Mail" on my desktop, and 1.1G of "Mail" on a bigger server. (Doesn't sound like that much anymore even though it goes back to 1988...) Searching both involves grep, and of course, it fails with base64 and other stuff. When my desktop was my laptop (that's another story), I pushed more mail From it to the bigger server for safer keeping. I'd like to access my "bigger server" via IMAP. I'd like to access my desktop Mail via IMAP from localhost, because I sometimes want to use a MUA which isn't MH. If a MUA on my desktop spoke Maildir, then I'd be happy without the IMAP layer. (In particular, it would be nice to be able to access both from my phone) I'd actually be totally happy with read-only IMAP. On the "bigger server", I might even make a new partition and mount it read-only. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
Description: PGP signature
-- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers