>Also, I'm not opposed to some other solution to patching inc than my >code. I take little pride in it. It's a sad "fix" for a lame problem >that shouldn't exist. Is there perhaps a public mailing list that >discusses email issues like this where we could actually get some voice >that would be recognized by big players? Something like NANOG? I think >it would be interesting to solicit some observations of others outside >the nmh community about violations of the relevant RFCs and what to do >about said violations. Is nmh really that wrong?
Those standards are defined by IETF (I get the impression NANOG is more large network operators). I understand the sentiment behind your desire to escalate this issue, but as you noted you tried very hard and didn't get anywhere. I doubt raising this with some larger organization will get you anywhere either. I would love to be proven wrong. And there are only so many hours in the day. As for nmh being wrong, well ... it cannot handle email that it seems literally every other piece of email software seems to handle just fine. What does that tell you? --Ken
