On Jan 2, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Jake_Covert wrote: > Thanks. Fixed here too. > Thanks to everyone for this workaround and bug report. I'm not sure what happened and I can't seem to recreate it but I'll look for a solution once I do.
> I'd love a way to show future transactions, but not have them update > the buckets. > > I don't understand why "pending" transactions would anyways. They're > not real (read: check hasn't been sent out). Once I put postage on > that check and it goes out the door, the check / transaction becomes > real and it's status must be changed to "open", and NOW should cause a > change in a bucket. > > Am I thinking about this incorrectly? The reason pending transactions affect bucket totals is so you can forecast your spending. This allows you to see what you will or won't have later in the month. MoneyWell will have other view options in future releases. Peace, Kevin Hoctor [email protected] No Thirst Software LLC http://nothirst.com http://kevinhoctor.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "No Thirst Software User Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
