Okay.
On Jan 2, 10:49 am, Kevin Hoctor <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Jake_Covert wrote:
>
> > Thanks. Fixed here too.
>
> Thanks to everyone for this workaround and bug report. I'm not sure
> what happened and I can't seem to recreate it but I'll look for a
> solution once I do.
>
> > I'd love a way to show future transactions, but not have them update
> > the buckets.
>
> > I don't understand why "pending" transactions would anyways. They're
> > not real (read: check hasn't been sent out). Once I put postage on
> > that check and it goes out the door, the check / transaction becomes
> > real and it's status must be changed to "open", and NOW should cause a
> > change in a bucket.
>
> > Am I thinking about this incorrectly?
>
> The reason pending transactions affect bucket totals is so you can
> forecast your spending. This allows you to see what you will or won't
> have later in the month. MoneyWell will have other view options in
> future releases.
>
> Peace,
>
> Kevin Hoctor
> [email protected]
> No Thirst Software LLChttp://nothirst.comhttp://kevinhoctor.blogspot.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "No
Thirst Software User Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/no-thirst-software?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
