On 13/01/16 11:43, notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
From 393558883ad677a3e3b6dcb74ce42a189d712576 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Parag Nemade <pnem...@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 10:43:33 +0530
Subject: Specify exclusively arch list as per nodejs packaging guidelines
---
nodejs-deep-extend.spec | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nodejs-deep-extend.spec b/nodejs-deep-extend.spec
index e34ec94..dbe09a0 100644
--- a/nodejs-deep-extend.spec
+++ b/nodejs-deep-extend.spec
@@ -5,14 +5,14 @@
Name: nodejs-%{module_name}
Version: 0.3.2
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
Summary: Recursive object extending
License: MIT
URL: https://github.com/unclechu/node-deep-extend
Source0:
http://registry.npmjs.org/%{module_name}/-/%{module_name}-%{version}.tgz
BuildArch: noarch
-ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch
+ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %{arm} noarch
This is the exact opposite of what the guidelines say surely?
The whole point of adding the nodejs_arches macro was to avoid having
the list of supported architectures embedded in all the spec files, so
that they could be extended in future without changing every spec.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
nodejs mailing list
nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
