On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Parag Nemade <pnem...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Tom, > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote: > > On 13/01/16 13:58, Parag Nemade wrote: > > > >> Yes you are right. The guidelines are not clear. I am not sure if > >> someone removed EPEL7 specific information but as of these days I am > >> not able to find that information in the nodejs packaging guidelines. > >> Therefore, I started adding dependency generator, expanded macro to > >> epel7 as well. The problem I found is that if I use that macro and > >> build the package then only srpm will appear in epel srpm repository > >> and corresponding binary noarch rpm will not get composed in > >> repository at all. > >> > >> See this ticket https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6323 > > > > > > That ticket is about EPEL6 though, where the macro isn't defined! > > > > I don't have an EPEL7 machine to check, but does it not have a > > redhat-rpm-config that contains /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.nodejs-srpm > > which defines the nodejs_arches macro? > > Yes redhat-rpm-config provides that macro in /etc/rpm/macros.nodejs-srpm > file. > > Do you want me to re-add that macro in the packages? Good to update > the nodejs packaging guidelines page as well to add this information. > > How about adding separate package say nodejs-rpm-macros in EPEL6 that will provide this macro? > Jason Tibbits is working on a rpm with missing macros for EPEL6, i've requested him to add the nodejs_arches and nodejs_find_provides_and_requires. I didn't get a confirmation, so you might better ask him again. > > Regards, > Parag. > _______________________________________________ > nodejs mailing list > nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ nodejs mailing list nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org
