Hi
If we expand the # of NCR's will the rosters expand by a similar
number ? If not we will run into some of the problems that were described
earlier. If we do expand rosters then we will need to change our cuts.
Some of the early draft pick teams are badly in need of AB's and
IP's and wouldn't benefit so much if at all. Leaving one more blue chip
prospect for the rest of us. Kinda like our tax and banking situation.
Buffalo votes to raise NCR's to 7 but only if roster expands to 42
otherwise we would vote no at this time.
Blaine
a message dated 1/9/2012 8:16:34 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
most voted to raise the NCR but the # differed. Therefore we are now
voting on what 2 make the max.
ROBERT
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Gary Brown <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: NCR input
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 10:41:06 -0800 (PST)
I don't think it is all the non playoff teams fault. The playoff teams
seem to have a better core of players with plenty of AB at each position. As
with my team I took over last year(Norfolk), I have been struggling to get
good starting players at each position because when we are able to keep 30
players. It will take a number of years to rebuild when 30+ players are
protected.
There are teams with 2-3 top starters at 1 position can sit on these
player without having to play them or play them out of position. I understand
if a emergency situation come up to play someone out of position, but a
manager played a player only rated at 3B at 4 other positions 2B, SS, LF, and
RF. MLB does use some players like this, but not like some managers use
them. Thats why there are utility players with many fielding ratings.
If the cut down was to 20 with the max NCR the manager wants to protect,
then a wider range of players will be in the draft every year. Every
managers would have to be more selective on which players they want as their
core
20. My 2�.
Gary
Norfolk
--- On Sat, 12/31/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: NCR input
To: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, December 31, 2011, 11:55 AM
I would be curious, Robert, seems like teams who made playoffs are voting
against raising it to 8 saying it would not help the teams not making
playoffs
WHILE the teams like me know otherwise who did not make playoffs. I
suggest listening to the teams that do not make playoffs on whether or not 8
NCRs would help a non playoff team.
Who can not field team with 33 players to cover usage all season? Teams
that are under AB and IP really have no excuse considering all the playing
time available from players left in draft. The amount of NCRs available at 8
make no difference. Usage problems are separate issues. I could assemble a
team each year made up of 33 players left in draft after completed that
could meet our usage requirements for season. Blaming NCRs will not solve the
problem of overusage. It is a DRAFTING problem. Drafting a catcher with 41
ABs when you need one with 200 ABs who is available is the problem. I
would like to address usage problems as well but veiling it as an NCR problem
is wrong way to look at it. There are SIMPLE draft rules in other leagues
that could solve problem in our league, such as all usage required must be
taken in draft by end of 8th round.
Anyway, I would say nothing except I saw a trend of playoff teams almost
all going against an increase in NCRs.
Also, I almost have ALL my player usage covered with my roster already of
25 players like major leagues do. I only need to draft 3 relievers
somewhere and I can draft 9 other guys no matter how much playing time they
have
based on future potential.
Research has shown that it takes 4 years average for a team to rebuild and
be competitive in a healthy league our size. I am suspicious of leagues
that have same people in playoffs or first place for 10 years straight. It
does not mean something is wrong, after all there are superior players. But
all other leagues I know and have played in do not have dynasties. Do the
rules in this league favor playoff teams that are making decisions for non
playoff teams on how to rebuild?
Anyway, either way, I get youth from NCRs or low innings and AB guys
because I take the time to make SURE I have playing time covered BEFORE the
draft. I just find usage problems interesting. The rules our league have for
usage are MINIMUM levels, not RECOMMENDED levels. I live to exceed those
limits. What needs to be increased is either the minimum levels of usage or
allowing players to be used at 110% of MLB. Anyway, too much talk, I just been
working so hard and will finally have a day off Monday to relax and pick
up pieces for 2012. We have a water leak and the guy can't come to fix it
till Monday. It is a trickle but nothing we can do.
Whatever the NCR limits are works for me. If I was commish (HERE COMES
REASON I SHOULD NEVER HAVE ANY DECISION MAKING RESPONSIBILITIES) After draft
I would calculate usage and if a team did NOT have enough usage I would
require them to DROP an NCR and replace him with a carded guy who gives him
enough usage. If people still overuse after starting the season with required
usage on their roster which must be maintained after trades then usage
rule is too LOW!
This is not rocket science or string theory. Even Penny could figure this
out.
thanks
ray
BKN
-----Original Message-----
From: suelou22 <[email protected]>
To: nombl <[email protected]>
Cc: john arcieri <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, Dec 31, 2011 9:53 am
Subject: Re: NCR input
This is the main reason we should not increase the NC players..we need to
draft more players with IP or ABs to get through the season in
respectability.....Lou---- john arcieri <[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]) > wrote: > My
inputis it should go up
to 6 NCR since we have 41 man roster. Also have you thought about a throw
back draft. A throw back draft is the next day after the draft you are
allowed to drop 1 player and pick up 1 player that wasn't drafted. This gives
teams that are under ABs or IPs to pick up a player they need for usage. It
would be a e-mail draft first e-mail sent gets that player. It seems like
every year a few teams have not enough ABs and IPs. John > > > >
________________________________ > From: "[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]) "
<[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]) > > To:
[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]) > Sent:
Friday, December 30, 2011 1:26 PM > Subject: NCR input >
> > would anyone else like to voice their thoughts on uncarded players
(anyone concidered carded - under 10 PA or ip) or NCR (players still concider
rookies not meeting the limits of NOMBL)? > > ROBERT > > ---------- Forwarded
Message ---------- > From: [email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]) > To:
[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]) >
Subject: bkn
drops, draft picks, ncr, roster, NCR input > Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011
16:13:25 -0500 (EST) > > > NOMBL DROPS > 1. RUSSELL BRANYAN > 2. TIM BYRDAK >
3.
MATT DIAZ > 4. BILL HALL > 5. AARON HILL > 6. BRANDON INGE > 7. RYAN KALISH
> 8. VIN MAZZARO > 9. COREY PATTERSON > 10. MATT PURKE (ncr) > 11. MAX
RAMIREZ > 12. BKN#10 DRAFT PICK > > MY DRAFT PICKS(12)- BKN #1-9, NEW #5,
BUZZ
#6, #7 > > ROSTER (29) > > NCR (4) > 1. GERRIT COLE > 2. BRYCE HARPER >
3. JURICKSON PROFAR > 4. GEORGE SPRINGER > > > HITTERS (15) > 1. CLINT
BARMES > 2. PETER BOURJOS > 3. JAMEY CARROLL > 4. IKE DAVIS > 5. ADAM
JONES > 6. JONATHON LUCROY > 7. JESUS MONTERO > 8. LOGAN MORRISON > 9. SEAN
RODRIGUEZ > 10. JIMMY ROLLINS > 11. CARLOS RUIZ > 12. GABBY SANCHEZ >
13. NICK SWISHER > 14. JOSH WILLINGHAM > 15. KEVIN YOUKILIS > > PITCHERS
(10) > 1. CLAY BUCHHOLZ > 2. JHOULYS CHACIN > 3. DEREK HOLLAND > 4.
KAMERON LOE > 5. KYLE LOHSE > 6. JAMES SHIELDS > 7. TIM STAUFFER > 8. JOSE
VALVERDE > 9. RYAN WEBB > 10. KERRY WOOD > as a team we would be in favor of
increasing our NCRs allowed to 8. > > > ray > BKN > > > > -- > You
received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL"
group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]) . > To
unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nombl+unsubscribe@googlegroups.
com) . > For more options, visit this group at
_http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en_
(http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en) . > >
____________________________________________________________ > 57 Year Old
Looks 27
> Local Woman Reveals Wrinkle Secret That Has Doctors Angry. >
TheSmartStyleLiving.com -- > You received this message because you are
subscribed to the
Google Groups "NOMBL" group. > To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]) . > To
unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected])
. > For more options, visit this group at
_http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en_
(http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en) . > > -- > You received this
message because you are subscribed to
the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. > To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]) . > To
unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected])
. > For more options, visit this group at
_http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en_
(http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en) . > -- You received this message
because you are subscribed
to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]) . To
unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]_
(http://us.mc1810.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected])
. For more options, visit this group at
_http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en_
(http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en) .
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
____________________________________________________________
_53 Year Old Mom Looks 33
The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried
_ (http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/4f0ae88ea2242152c1afst04duc)
_consumerproducts.com_
(http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/4f0ae88ea2242152c1afst04duc)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"NOMBL" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
