I AGREE..............7 "THE MICK"........................... BUT HARSHER PENALTIES FOR ANY PLAYER WITH 5 ABs, OR 5 IP............OVERUSE.................... ANY MORE THAN THAT THERE IS NO DEFENSE FOR............IT IS EASY TO GO OVER 1 OR 2 ..............BUT NOT MORE THAN 5..............MY THOUGHTS .LOU................... ---- [email protected] wrote: > From Six to Seven...SEVEN in honor of the most beloved player in > baseball...The Mick. > > > ray > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: vasquires <[email protected]> > To: nombl <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Jan 9, 2012 8:16 am > Subject: NCR increaded? > > > most voted to raise the NCR but the # differed. Therefore we are now voting > on what 2 make the max. > > > ROBERT > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Gary Brown <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: NCR input > Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 10:41:06 -0800 (PST) > > > > > > I don't think it is all the non playoff teams fault. The playoff teams seem > to have a better core of players with plenty of AB at each position. As with > my team I took over last year(Norfolk), I have been struggling to get good > starting players at each position because when we are able to keep 30 > players. It will take a number of years to rebuild when 30+ players are > protected. > > There are teams with 2-3 top starters at 1 position can sit on these player > without having to play them or play them out of position. I understand if a > emergency situation come up to play someone out of position, but a manager > played a player only rated at 3B at 4 other positions 2B, SS, LF, and RF. > MLB does use some players like this, but not like some managers use them. > Thats why there are utility players with many fielding ratings. > > If the cut down was to 20 with the max NCR the manager wants to protect, then > a wider range of players will be in the draft every year. Every managers > would have to be more selective on which players they want as their core 20. > My 2�. > > Gary > Norfolk > > > --- On Sat, 12/31/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: NCR input > To: [email protected] > Date: Saturday, December 31, 2011, 11:55 AM > > > I would be curious, Robert, seems like teams who made playoffs are voting > against raising it to 8 saying it would not help the teams not making playoffs > > WHILE the teams like me know otherwise who did not make playoffs. I suggest > listening to the teams that do not make playoffs on whether or not 8 NCRs > would help a non playoff team. > > Who can not field team with 33 players to cover usage all season? Teams that > are under AB and IP really have no excuse considering all the playing time > available from players left in draft. The amount of NCRs available at 8 make > no difference. Usage problems are separate issues. I could assemble a team > each year made up of 33 players left in draft after completed that could meet > our usage requirements for season. Blaming NCRs will not solve the problem of > overusage. It is a DRAFTING problem. Drafting a catcher with 41 ABs when you > need one with 200 ABs who is available is the problem. I would like to > address usage problems as well but veiling it as an NCR problem is wrong way > to look at it. There are SIMPLE draft rules in other leagues that could solve > problem in our league, such as all usage required must be taken in draft by > end of 8th round. > > Anyway, I would say nothing except I saw a trend of playoff teams almost all > going against an increase in NCRs. > > Also, I almost have ALL my player usage covered with my roster already of 25 > players like major leagues do. I only need to draft 3 relievers somewhere and > I can draft 9 other guys no matter how much playing time they have based on > future potential. > > Research has shown that it takes 4 years average for a team to rebuild and be > competitive in a healthy league our size. I am suspicious of leagues that > have same people in playoffs or first place for 10 years straight. It does > not mean something is wrong, after all there are superior players. But all > other leagues I know and have played in do not have dynasties. Do the rules > in this league favor playoff teams that are making decisions for non playoff > teams on how to rebuild? > > Anyway, either way, I get youth from NCRs or low innings and AB guys because > I take the time to make SURE I have playing time covered BEFORE the draft. I > just find usage problems interesting. The rules our league have for usage are > MINIMUM levels, not RECOMMENDED levels. I live to exceed those limits. What > needs to be increased is either the minimum levels of usage or allowing > players to be used at 110% of MLB. Anyway, too much talk, I just been working > so hard and will finally have a day off Monday to relax and pick up pieces > for 2012. We have a water leak and the guy can't come to fix it till Monday. > It is a trickle but nothing we can do. > > Whatever the NCR limits are works for me. If I was commish (HERE COMES > REASON I SHOULD NEVER HAVE ANY DECISION MAKING RESPONSIBILITIES) After draft > I would calculate usage and if a team did NOT have enough usage I would > require them to DROP an NCR and replace him with a carded guy who gives him > enough usage. If people still overuse after starting the season with required > usage on their roster which must be maintained after trades then usage rule > is too LOW! > This is not rocket science or string theory. Even Penny could figure this out. > > thanks > > ray > BKN > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: suelou22 <[email protected]> > To: nombl <[email protected]> > Cc: john arcieri <[email protected]> > Sent: Sat, Dec 31, 2011 9:53 am > Subject: Re: NCR input > > > This is the main reason we should not increase the NC players..we need to > draft more players with IP or ABs to get through the season in > respectability.....Lou---- john arcieri <[email protected]> wrote: > My > inputis it should go up to 6 NCR since we have 41 man roster. Also have you > thought about a throw back draft. A throw back draft is the next day after > the draft you are allowed to drop 1 player and pick up 1 player that wasn't > drafted. This gives teams that are under ABs or IPs to pick up a player they > need for usage. It would be a e-mail draft first e-mail sent gets that > player. It seems like every year a few teams have not enough ABs and IPs. > John > > > > ________________________________ > From: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, December > 30, 2011 1:26 PM > Subject: NCR input > > > would anyone else like to voice > their thoughts on uncarded players (anyone concidered carded - under 10 PA or > ip) or NCR (players still concider rookies not meeting the limits of NOMBL)? > > > ROBERT > > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > From: > [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: bkn drops, draft > picks, ncr, roster, NCR input > Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:13:25 -0500 (EST) > > > > NOMBL DROPS > 1. RUSSELL BRANYAN > 2. TIM BYRDAK > 3. MATT DIAZ > 4. > BILL HALL > 5. AARON HILL > 6. BRANDON INGE > 7. RYAN KALISH > 8. VIN MAZZARO > > 9. COREY PATTERSON > 10. MATT PURKE (ncr) > 11. MAX RAMIREZ > 12. BKN#10 > DRAFT PICK > > MY DRAFT PICKS(12)- BKN #1-9, NEW #5, BUZZ #6, #7 > > > ROSTER (29) > > NCR (4) > 1. GERRIT COLE > 2. BRYCE HARPER > 3. JURICKSON > PROFAR > 4. GEORGE SPRINGER > > > HITTERS (15) > 1. CLINT BARMES > 2. > PETER BOURJOS > 3. JAMEY CARROLL > 4. IKE DAVIS > 5. ADAM JONES > 6. > JONATHON LUCROY > 7. JESUS MONTERO > 8. LOGAN MORRISON > 9. SEAN RODRIGUEZ > > 10. JIMMY ROLLINS > 11. CARLOS RUIZ > 12. GABBY SANCHEZ > 13. NICK > SWISHER > 14. JOSH WILLINGHAM > 15. KEVIN YOUKILIS > > PITCHERS (10) > > 1. CLAY BUCHHOLZ > 2. JHOULYS CHACIN > 3. DEREK HOLLAND > 4. KAMERON LOE > > 5. KYLE LOHSE > 6. JAMES SHIELDS > 7. TIM STAUFFER > 8. JOSE VALVERDE > 9. > RYAN WEBB > 10. KERRY WOOD > as a team we would be in favor of increasing > our NCRs allowed to 8. > > > ray > BKN > > > > -- > You received this > message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. > To > post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe > from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more > options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. > > > ____________________________________________________________ > 57 Year Old > Looks 27 > Local Woman Reveals Wrinkle Secret That Has Doctors Angry. > > TheSmartStyleLiving.com -- > You received this message because you are > subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. > To post to this group, send > email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email > to [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. > > -- > You received this > message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. > To > post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe > from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more > options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NOMBL" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NOMBL" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NOMBL" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. > > > ____________________________________________________________ > 53 Year Old Mom Looks 33 > The Stunning Results of Her Wrinkle Trick Has Botox Doctors Worried > consumerproducts.comconsumerproducts.com > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NOMBL" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NOMBL" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NOMBL" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nombl?hl=en.
