cshannon commented on PR #3417:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/3417#issuecomment-1564444490

   > It had been asked if the StoredTabletFile should target 2.1 or 3. I am 
still inclined that 3.0 (or 3.1) is the correct destination - but seeing the 
above conversation, could the errors that are being seen with 2.1 and metadata 
syncs be hitting some of the "discovered" bugs?
   > 
   > Is there a way to tell when a situation might occur? Something like 
entries in the metadata table are not normalized, or normalized somehow 
different?
   > 
   > What I am asking is there something we could ask the 2.1 folks to scan for 
to see if their environment has a higher opportunity to hit these bugs - or 
(hopefully) all the paths are normalized, so its unlikely that they would see 
an issue and it is unlikely this could be contributing to the sync issues?
   
   My plan is to leave the refactoring here to still target 3.0. However, I am 
going to work on a another PR for 2.1 that fixes the issues that @keith-turner 
identified. I think we should fix any bugs in 2.1 but the refactoring should 
stay with 3.0. I also am planning to go ahead and rename TabletFile to 
ReferencedTabletFile and create the interface I mentioned to make things more 
clear.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to