wu-sheng commented on a change in pull request #4236: Optimize the 
elasticsearch-based query interface provided to UI
URL: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/4236#discussion_r367921235
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
oap-server/server-core/src/main/java/org/apache/skywalking/oap/server/core/query/DurationUtils.java
 ##########
 @@ -216,4 +216,59 @@ private DateTime parseToDateTime(Downsampling 
downsampling, long time) throws Pa
 
         return dateTime;
     }
+
+    public long convertBucketTotIimestamp(boolean isStart, long bucket) throws 
ParseException {
 
 Review comment:
   First, timeBucket isn't in the format you are demonstrating. Then, I am not 
talking who can put what codes in any place. My point is always being, put the 
storage optimization codes inside the storage implementation. Don't change the 
storage model interface unless you have to.
   
   > why can't I put it into DurationUtils so that he can reuse this logic?
   
   This question is really not a good way to discuss the question. I hope you 
wouldn't do this again. The things we discussed is not about whom, @dmsolr is 
showing something he is working on, his PR is in the WIP status, no 
review/merge.  
   
   Also, you should understand, as an official committer, he actually really 
has some privileges to change APIs, it could be easier than you. Because he has 
been involved in source codes level a long time, and be familiar with the 
workflow (You could simply check his GitHub repo changelog). But, even there is 
a privilege, back to this case, I or he never use this priority. So, being an 
open source project, please don't consider discussion(arguing between you and 
others) in this way.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to