On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:07:36 +0600, Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag at dottedmag.net> wrote: > The only problem with Cc is that Mailman suppresses duplicate messages and > hence > there is no List-Id: on message.
Hey, well notmuch doesn't even index the List-Id: header anyway. [*] ;-) But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to be useless. Any reason not to just use something like to:notmuch at notmuchmail to match messages sent to a list like this one? I think mailman defaults to not allowing messages with the mailing-list address implicit (such as in a Bcc) so it seems like matching the list recipient will be more reliable than hoping the List-Id is always there. -Carl [*] Our TODO list does talk about supporting a configuration parameter for indexing additional headers of interest. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091204/d72d0cf7/attachment.pgp>
