Twas brillig at 16:39:50 04.12.2009 UTC-08 when cworth at did gyre 
and gimble:

 CW> But when viewing an actual message, I'm still planning on having
 CW> notmuch just return an arbitrary filename from the list of
 CW> filenames associated with that message. Does anyone see any problem
 CW> with that? Can you think of a case where you'd really care about
 CW> seeing one or the other of a particular duplicated message?

There might be different Reply-To fields.

So I'd just return bigger dup, as it probably contains more information

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available

Reply via email to