Twas brillig at 10:35:27 04.12.2009 UTC-08 when cworth at cworth.org did gyre 
and gimble:

 >> The only problem with Cc is that Mailman suppresses duplicate
 >> messages and hence there is no List-Id: on message.

 CW> But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough
 CW> to be useless.  Any reason not to just use something like
 CW> to:notmuch at notmuchmail to match messages sent to a list like this
 CW> one?

Automated processing. I'd go crazy to put all mailing lists' addresses
to .procmailrc instead of simple sorter in sed. But it seems it's the
only reliable way.

 CW> I think mailman defaults to not allowing messages with the
 CW> mailing-list address implicit (such as in a Bcc) so it seems like
 CW> matching the list recipient will be more reliable than hoping the
 CW> List-Id is always there.

Yep. Unfortunately.

-- 
  http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091205/1283340b/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to