On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, David Bremner <david at tethera.net> wrote: > dm-list-email-notmuch at scs.stanford.edu writes: > >> >> As far as updating the test suite, etc., it's almost certain that the >> core notmuch developers would be unsatisfied with whatever I've done, >> since the code base is very clean and has a very uniform style. So when >> I say I'd want some "indication that such a change could be upstreamed," >> I mean more specifically that someone would be willing to shepherd the >> process of getting the code into shape. >> > > I think it depends on your definition of shepherd. If it means review > your patches and tell you what needs to be done, then we can probably > handle that. Things tend to stall if the patch proposer loses interest > after the first review, so we're pretty far from "fire and forget". > > I'd like to hear one or two more opinions from regular contributors > before I say "yes, this is something we want to do."
FYI everyone, message modification times has been proposed before . BR, Jani.  id:1323796305-28789-1-git-send-email-schnouki at schnouki.net http://mid.gmane.org/1323796305-28789-1-git-send-email-schnouki at schnouki.net