----- "Lars Corneliussen" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure about my vote. > > I experience lots of trouble in combination with Maven 3 and Windows > 64-bit. I was able to "fake" 64bit away. When I then run with Maven > 2.2.1 most its pass. > > Those are the failing tests. > > testConflictingExtensions(npanday.its.NPandayIT10276ConflictingExtensionsTest) > testMVCProject(npanday.its.NPandayIT11480MVCProjectTest) > testWpfProject(npanday.its.NPandayIT12549WpfProjectTest) > testWebAppInstall(npanday.its.NPandayITVBWebAppTest) > testNet35Project(npanday.its.NPandayITNet35Test) > > testClassLibWithWebRefInstall(npanday.its.NPandayITClassLibWithWebRefInstallTest) > > Reasons: > > 1) testConflictingExtensions fails resolving > "com.adobe.flex.sdkcore:framework:swc:3.2.0.3958" - i gave up on it > > 2) testMVCProject, testWpfProject, testNet35Project fail because I > have > not VS 2008 installed. Somehow the Win7 SDK with .NET 3.5 doesn't > install the SDK-stuff for Compact Framework. I can oversee that. > > 3) testConflictingExtensions > > 4) testWebAppInstall has trouble with either framework versions or > 64bit, getting a "This assembly is built by a runtime newer than the > currently loaded runtime and cannot be loaded" > > 5) NPandayITClassLibWithWebRefInstallTest is not able to run wsdl > command > > Since Maven 3 is the new default, and Windows 64bit is quite common > too, > I would rather suggest to release a 1.3.1 fix, that has good support > for > those.
I think it could be something with our environment variables that is causing the issue. I'm also on Windows 7 64bit right now but still on Maven 2.2.1 As for the support for Maven 3 I think we could include that to the 2.0 instead of doing a 1.3.1? Since we've already started developing items on 2.0 Perhaps we could just emphasize on the documentation that Maven 3 support will be on 2.0? > I'm also not sure about how things work with mono in 1.3-incubating. > Have you tested that? Unfortunately I haven't done any testing on mono just on the different VSs > What do you think? How many more votes do we need? I think 2 more votes, especially from our members of the incubating PMC :D > yours, > Lars > > Am 27.01.11 08:58, schrieb Josimpson Ocaba: > > Sorry for the broken links. > > > > > > > > Repository Builder> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-npanday/npanday/npanday-repository-builder/1.3-incubating/ > > MS Installer> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-npanday/npanday/npanday-installer/1.3-incubating/ > > Source> > http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-npanday/npanday/npanday-project/1.3-incubating/ > > Docs> > http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.3-incubating/index.html > > > > > > Hi NPanday Users, > > > > After all the hard work that everyone in the community gave, I'm > happy to announce that NPanday 1.3 Incubating is available and ready > for your testing and voting. > > > > You can start testing here: > > > > Repository Builder> http :// vmbuild . apache .org/ archiva > /repository/staged- npanday / npanday / npanday > -repository-builder/1.3-incubating/ > > MS Installer> http :// vmbuild . apache .org/ archiva > /repository/staged- npanday / npanday / npanday > -installer/1.3-incubating/ > > Source> http :// vmbuild . apache .org/ archiva /repository/staged- > npanday / npanday / npanday -project/1.3-incubating/ > > > > The docs for 1.3 Incubating can also be found here: http > ://incubator. apache .org/ npanday /docs/1.3-incubating/index. html > > > > [] +1 1.3 Incubating passes and is ready for release > > [] 0 Don't care > > [] -1 Objection and please state the reason why. > > > > Thanks again for the people who contributed patches and filed > issues. > > > > Cheers, > >
