On 11/02/2011, at 9:11 PM, Lars Corneliussen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure about my vote.
The criteria I used: - works at least as well as the previous release (doesn't have to be perfect - just no regressions) - meets the criteria for an ASF release > > I experience lots of trouble in combination with Maven 3 and Windows 64-bit. > I was able to "fake" 64bit away. When I then run with Maven 2.2.1 most its > pass. > > Those are the failing tests. > > testConflictingExtensions(npanday.its.NPandayIT10276ConflictingExtensionsTest) > testMVCProject(npanday.its.NPandayIT11480MVCProjectTest) > testWpfProject(npanday.its.NPandayIT12549WpfProjectTest) > testWebAppInstall(npanday.its.NPandayITVBWebAppTest) > testNet35Project(npanday.its.NPandayITNet35Test) > > testClassLibWithWebRefInstall(npanday.its.NPandayITClassLibWithWebRefInstallTest) > > Reasons: > > 1) testConflictingExtensions fails resolving > "com.adobe.flex.sdkcore:framework:swc:3.2.0.3958" - i gave up on it Bad IT - you need the repo in that POM added to your repository manager. > > 2) testMVCProject, testWpfProject, testNet35Project fail because I have not > VS 2008 installed. Somehow the Win7 SDK with .NET 3.5 doesn't install the > SDK-stuff for Compact Framework. I can oversee that. There was a resolution to this that I can't find right now... seems like a known issue to document. > > 3) testConflictingExtensions What's the failure? > > 4) testWebAppInstall has trouble with either framework versions or 64bit, > getting a "This assembly is built by a runtime newer than the currently > loaded runtime and cannot be loaded" > > 5) NPandayITClassLibWithWebRefInstallTest is not able to run wsdl command > > Since Maven 3 is the new default, and Windows 64bit is quite common too, I > would rather suggest to release a 1.3.1 fix, that has good support for those. I'm using Maven 3 day to day, though my Windows box I was testing this on is only 32-bit & Maven 2.2.1. Agree with yourself and Joe here - that it's best left to a future version. As for what version it is, really just depends on what has been done by that point. I think we can only afford to support one branch of development, and we want to release small amounts frequently rather than getting into stagnation with a big release plan. If the RDF removal happens, I'd call that 2.0, otherwise 1.3.1 based on the currently scheduled list :) > > I'm also not sure about how things work with mono in 1.3-incubating. Have you > tested that? There are still some issues to overcome here, that have already been there. I've made some improvements - it'd be good to get others interested that would use it and can help in future releases. > > What do you think? How many more votes do we need? > > yours, > Lars > > Am 27.01.11 08:58, schrieb Josimpson Ocaba: >> Sorry for the broken links. >> >> >> >> Repository Builder> >> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-npanday/npanday/npanday-repository-builder/1.3-incubating/ >> MS Installer> >> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-npanday/npanday/npanday-installer/1.3-incubating/ >> Source> >> http://vmbuild.apache.org/archiva/repository/staged-npanday/npanday/npanday-project/1.3-incubating/ >> Docs> http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.3-incubating/index.html >> >> >> Hi NPanday Users, >> >> After all the hard work that everyone in the community gave, I'm happy to >> announce that NPanday 1.3 Incubating is available and ready for your testing >> and voting. >> >> You can start testing here: >> >> Repository Builder> http :// vmbuild . apache .org/ archiva >> /repository/staged- npanday / npanday / npanday >> -repository-builder/1.3-incubating/ >> MS Installer> http :// vmbuild . apache .org/ archiva /repository/staged- >> npanday / npanday / npanday -installer/1.3-incubating/ >> Source> http :// vmbuild . apache .org/ archiva /repository/staged- npanday >> / npanday / npanday -project/1.3-incubating/ >> >> The docs for 1.3 Incubating can also be found here: http ://incubator. >> apache .org/ npanday /docs/1.3-incubating/index. html >> >> [] +1 1.3 Incubating passes and is ready for release >> [] 0 Don't care >> [] -1 Objection and please state the reason why. >> >> Thanks again for the people who contributed patches and filed issues. >> >> Cheers, >> > -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
