The simple-rtp example uses the "multicast on" option so I'd rather stick to a multicast protocol for now.
With ADMR one node can send RTP packets to nodes that belong to one multicast group but each one of them sends RTCP packets to that node (unicast), while with PUMA the nodes send RTCP packets to a multicast group address? Fivos.K wrote: > > the packet order can be fixed by removing the jitter when sending the rtp > packets. > > The reason there are too few RTCP packets is because of the way PUMA > functions. Ideally you would like RTCP packets to be sent using Unicast. > This is not possible with PUMA. You should try ADMR which still > outperforms MAODV and is able to send these packets using a unicast > mechanism. > > Fivos K. > > > pebbles wrote: >> >> Thanx a lot for your answer! >> >> I used PUMA, but I think there's sth wrong with the packet order. I also >> saw too many RTP packets and too few RTCP. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/RTP-over-wireless-connection-between-two-nodes-tp31407109p31679003.html Sent from the ns-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
