i have ported them both for ns2.31 , i could upload them somewhere if you are
interested but you could also use them in the ns version they support. 


pebbles wrote:
> 
> Do I have to configure myself the unicast mechanism so as to send RTCP
> packets only to the sender node (and of course keeping the multicast for
> RTP packets, so that the sender sends to every receiver node)? I'm asking
> this because in case of having more receiver nodes I'd want the RTP
> packets to be sent to all of them.
> 
> Also, I couldn't find a working version of either protocol (MAODV,ADMR)
> for ns 2.34. I think it's been a long time since they have been updated...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Fivos.K wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> pebbles wrote:
>>> 
>>> The simple-rtp example uses the "multicast on" option so I'd rather
>>> stick to a multicast protocol for now.
>>> 
>>> With ADMR one node can send RTP packets to nodes that belong to one
>>> multicast group but each one of them 
>>> sends RTCP packets to that node (unicast), while with PUMA the nodes
>>> send RTCP packets to a multicast group address? 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> They are all multicast protocols. Simply MAODV and ADMR allow use of
>> unicast as well. The RTCP packets should only be sent to the sender and
>> not to the whole group,  so by sending them using a unicast mechanism you
>> decrease the number of collisions in your setup.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/RTP-over-wireless-connection-between-two-nodes-tp31407109p31686327.html
Sent from the ns-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to