Because he built us a good team with longevity, not a team of old has beens. That team was also a good investment as it will be worth more than what was paid for it. That's shrewd business and in stark contrast to teh previous managers we had.
Because getting into too much debt could be a disaster for the club. We're not going to spend big and he's good at buying players for little money and making them play well. Because his approach has been shown to work. Remind me how many years and how many managers and how much money we burned trying to get promoted? Then compare it to what he spent in actually winning the Championship. Because changing manager is unlikely to change our fortunes. If you have evidence that changing manager is a proven way of improving results for a club in the medium term then show me. I presented my facts recently to say the opposite. Because, realistically, we have to be prepared to bounce up and down to become established 2009/11/25 Morris, Lee SGT <[email protected]> > What a terrible predicament we are in, we've got a manager who may just > fluke it and keep us up, but if we do go down we know he's a good > championship manager. > > So what you are saying is we are unlikely to sack him this season because > he'll be ok in the lower league? > > Why does he deserve a full season this year???? Surely if it looks likely > that he will take us down, we should act whilst there is still time for us > to be saved?....Another month and we'll have a better idea. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Steven Millward [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 November 2009 13:20 > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] New Pompey Manger Odds [sec=unclassified] > > I doubt MM will get sacked until he's in the same position as DJ next > season. I can't see him getting the boot this season no matter what the > result. He deserves a full go this season and he's the man for the job next > season if we are down. > > 2009/11/25 Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> > >> in this age of "player power", maybe we should do away with the manager >> role, after all the manager had no influence over the performance of the >> team if I remember correctly ;-) and let the players decide how they want to >> play? >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Steven Millward [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 November 2009 1:34 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] New Pompey Manger Odds [sec=unclassified] >> >> And replace him with Paul Ince I presume? >> >> >> >> 2009/11/25 Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> >> >>> so if Pompey can sack their manager so soon, why can't we do the same? >>> Come on Morgan, you know it makes sense... >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Morris, Lee SGT [mailto:[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 25 November 2009 10:54 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* [NSWolves] New Pompey Manger Odds [sec=unclassified] >>> >>> >>> >>> From William Hill: >>> >>> HILLS: PORTSMOUTH NEXT PERMANENT BOSS.. >>> >>> DARREN FERGUSSON 2/1 >>> ALAN CURBISHLEY 3/1 >>> STEVE COPPELL 4/1 >>> AVRAM GRANT 5/1 >>> STEVE MCCLAREN 12/1 >>> KEVIN KEEGAN 16/1 >>> PAUL GROVES 16/1 >>> JOE JORDAN 16/1 >>> GRAEME SOUNESS 16/1 >>> ALAN SHEARER 16/1 >>> PAUL JEWELL 16/1 >>> DAVID O LEARY 20/1 >>> GARETH SOUTHGATE 20/1 >>> SLAVEN BILIC 20/1 >>> TERRY VENABLES 20/1 >>> SVEN GORAN 20/1 >>> OWEN COYLE 25/1 >>> HARRY REDKNAPP 50/1 >>> TONY ADAMS 100/1 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid >>> >>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not >>> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this >>> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee >>> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions >>> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of >>> Macquarie. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid >>> >> >> -- >> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid >> >> -- >> Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid >> > > -- > Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid > > -- > Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid > -- Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
