All managers get sacked or quit and Mick will at some point. You'll then be able to say "I've told you for the last four years he was no good. I told you when we won the Championship and stayed in the Premiership that he was no good."
Many other people have been quite happy with Mick over the last few years. I must admit I'm unhappy about our position and I can see why people are turning against him. However, I stand by these two points: (a) Statistical evidence that changing managers has no impact on performance over a season. (b) The absence of a credible alternative to come to Wolves if Mick is sacked (someone who would come and someone who would be better). There's no point debating (a) but if you can suggest an answer to be I'll fill out my application and pay you my subs. On 18 October 2010 13:45, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>wrote: > Judging by the commentary on here since the West Ham game, I’d struggle > to find someone who doesn’t want to see MM out, excluding your good self ;-) > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 18 October 2010 1:42 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Splinter Cell? > > > > Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. You happen to be right at the > moment but arguably haven't been right for the last four years as Wolves > have progressed from expectations of a Championship relegation battle to a > second season in the Premier League. > > > > Paul Crowe's defection to BTMO is sexually motivated. Who else is in the > "rush of applications" that you cite? > > > > > > > > > On 18 October 2010 13:29, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Roughly one month ago (13th September) it was quoted on this list that the > BTMO doomsayers (both of us) were a splinter cell within NSWolves who must > be getting bored by the fact that we were continuing to grind out good > results. Well it seems that there has been a sudden rush of applications to > join the BTMO Club. > > > > How times have changed; are we really that fickle to suddenly decide that 4 > weeks of results has instantly made MM rubbish? > > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the > intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee > the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions > expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of > Macquarie. > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
