That's the thing.  He's one of the best managers in the Championship but we
sacked him.  Having a lesser manager is surely going to be no good.

We've been through this so many times.  At least if someone calls to sack
Mick, can they please suggest a replacement.

On 19 October 2010 08:34, LEESE Matthew <matthew_le...@rta.nsw.gov.au>wrote:

>  Maybe we should give him another go?
>
>  ------------------------------
>  *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Rog & Reet
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 19 October 2010 8:32 AM
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Splinter Cell?
>
>    That’s right.
>
> Was astounded he’d signed someone under 40 though.
>
>
>
> He’s not all bad, he has got Bothroyd playing regularly.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 19 October 2010 8:11 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Splinter Cell?
>
>
>
> No way back for Dave Jones then Rog?
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Rog & Reet
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 19 October 2010 7:52 AM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Splinter Cell?
>
> Anybody that signs Keogh, even on loan, should forever be banned from
> managing our glorious club.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Monday, 18 October 2010 4:26 PM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Splinter Cell?
>
>
>
> So we should sack Mick on the basis that Morgan has someone great in the
> wings?  All I ask for is a couple of names.  The pool of qualified football
> managers is not that vast and it's all conducted in public so who should it
> be?
>
>
>
> There's a fella at Cardiff called Jones.  He's a successful lower league
> manager.  Maybe we should get him in.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 18 October 2010 14:26, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>
> wrote:
>
> I’ve always had an issue with MM and his selection policy (playing people
> out of position and preferring hard work over ability) but I have also given
> credit when we have put in good performances.  If you believe the current
> run of abject performances combined with a puzzling selection/recruitment
> policies is the way that you want our club to be run then you clearly have
> lower expectations or standards than I.  Yes he presents a funny post match
> conference but that’s just a ploy to distract people from the dire
> performances that he has overseen.
>
>
>
> As mere armchair supporters stranded in the Antipodeans how could we
> possibly comment on who an astute business man such as Morgan has
> connections to.  We automatically assume that we have to have someone of
> vast experience to make us successful.  By way of example only, our dear
> friends The Baggies appointed Roberto Di Matteo with only 1 year of
> managerial experience under his belt.  He won promotion in his first season
> and has a team playing attractive attacking football in the premier league.
> The unfancied Blackpool appointed a manager who is almost certifiable and
> has no previous record of success, yet he has managed to mould a team that,
> so far, has been successful playing attacking football.  Even if both these
> teams to do end up getting relegated at the end of the season, I’m sure
> their fans will have enjoyed the season much more than ourselves who are
> likely to achieve the same result (relegation) but only after suffering a
> season with a complete lack of creativity or attacking intent.
>
>
>
> We don’t know what Morgan’s master-plan is.  I’m fairly sure that even if
> he had people in mind to come and manage the club, we would be the last to
> hear about it, but all I’m saying is it doesn’t necessarily need to be a big
> name who we can look to statistics to demonstrate whether he is “better” or
> not that Thick Mick.
>
>
>
> I have faith that Morgan is a good businessman.  Wolves and Premier League
> football is a business.  Let’s hope he makes the right business decisions
> before it is too late.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Monday, 18 October 2010 1:59 PM
>
>
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Splinter Cell?
>
>
>
> All managers get sacked or quit and Mick will at some point.  You'll then
> be able to say "I've told you for the last four years he was no good.  I
> told you when we won the Championship and stayed in the Premiership that he
> was no good."
>
>
>
> Many other people have been quite happy with Mick over the last few years.
> I must admit I'm unhappy about our position and I can see why people are
> turning against him.  However, I stand by these two points:
>
>
>
> (a)  Statistical evidence that changing managers has no impact on
> performance over a season.
>
> (b)  The absence of a credible alternative to come to Wolves if Mick is
> sacked (someone who would come and someone who would be better).
>
>
>
> There's no point debating (a) but if you can suggest an answer to be I'll
> fill out my application and pay you my subs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 18 October 2010 13:45, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>
> wrote:
>
> Judging by the commentary on here since the West Ham game, I’d struggle to
> find someone who doesn’t want to see MM out, excluding your good self ;-)
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Steven Millward
> *Sent:* Monday, 18 October 2010 1:42 PM
> *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Splinter Cell?
>
>
>
> Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.  You happen to be right at the
> moment but arguably haven't been right for the last four years as Wolves
> have progressed from expectations of a Championship relegation battle to a
> second season in the Premier League.
>
>
>
> Paul Crowe's defection to BTMO is sexually motivated.  Who else is in the
> "rush of applications" that you cite?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 18 October 2010 13:29, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>
> wrote:
>
> Roughly one month ago (13th September) it was quoted on this list that the
> BTMO doomsayers (both of us) were a splinter cell within NSWolves who must
> be getting bored by the fact that we were continuing to grind out good
> results.  Well it seems that there has been a sudden rush of applications to
> join the BTMO Club.
>
>
>
> How times have changed; are we really that fickle to suddenly decide that 4
> weeks of results has instantly made MM rubbish?
>
> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
> email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
> the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
> expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
> Macquarie.
>
>
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>
>
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>
>
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>
>
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
> Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
> e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
> named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed
> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily
> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
> recipient.
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
> Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This
> e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the
> named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged
> information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any
> mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
> unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed
> in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily
> the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not
> disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended
> recipient.
>
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out!
>

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

Reply via email to