I'm with you apart from the private school bit - if we stopped funding them
the education system would collapse within 2 years. It's much cheaper to
make the rich richer than to try and bring everyone to the lowest common
denominator.

 

  _____  

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 7:43 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Why don't they scrap things that really are useless?

Middle class welfare would be a great start.

Health insurance subsidies that are a middle class tax dodge and also give
money to hypochondriacs who visit charlatans like reiki practitioners.

The billions wasted on stinking rich private and religious schools.

School chaplaincy program.

Baby bonuses and associated perks that encourage over population.

Involvement in unwinnable wars started by the war mad septics.

MPs and ex MPs outrageous perks. We'd save millions straight away by sending
the lying Rodent to the Hague to be tried with other war criminals.

 

Then get some proper money in.

Make the corporate tax for rip off merchants, such as mining companies and
banks, 75%.

All corporate bonuses to be taxed at a flat rate of 80%.

Make religious organisations pay tax and rates.

The tax rate for junk food companies should be 98%, the same level as the
fat and sugar in their garbage.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:26 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

Why don't they ditch the stupid NBN white elephant that is going to be out
of date before it's even rolled out.  That would give them about $40b to
rebuild infrastructure.

 

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Steven Millward
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 4:22 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Flood levy

 

And so true.  They are terrified of not getting back into surplus by 2013
and so won't borrow the money, which is what a government should do in this
situation.  

 

You can also guarantee that if the budget is suddenly further in the black
one year than expected they'll find some waste of money to spunk it on
rather than give it back.

 


 

On 27 January 2011 15:49, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>
wrote:

Had to laugh at this comment that someone put up on the SMH website about
the flood levy:

 

So.... swany and co blow the surplus on dodgy insulation schemes and
throwing $900 to dead people, non australians and bogans to buy a plasma
tele's, smokes and pokies and then demand everyone pay it back because
suddenly the kitty is bare for infrastructure rebuilding? Priceless economic
mismanagement by a group of labor hacks that have never even run a school
canteen

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions
expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of
Macquarie.

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

 

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

Reply via email to